Now, your theory is something I did consider, however should the Geass have worn off for Carve-tan
I didn't say 'worn off', I said 'stopped', there's a difference in the wording and the actions after, my theory holds that it 're-starts'.
It'd be a stretch to assume so. If anything, Suzaku's will to live on might possibly be evidence that Lulu's geass is still affecting those that have experienced it. Otherwise, Suzaku might have gone back to his martyr-ish ways rather than taking an active role in changing the future.
Excepting the fact that a geass that goes against the very nature of someone is able to be fought against (see: Euphimia), this indicates that to live, is NOT against Suzaku's nature, whatever actions he displays consciously. Yes, consciously Suzaku displays actions that are self-sacrificial, but just as people's actions change as they grow (both physically and mentally), so do their sub-conscious actions, and as I'm not Suzaku's sub-conscious, I can't say for sure, but evidence leans to the idea that his sub-conscious actions lean towards living, saving himself, and secondary everyone else.
He killed his own father, to preserve himself (and by extension Japan), he sacrificed Lelouch in order to achive his own goals, putting himself in a better position to not only escape the stigma of his nationality, but his position which was perilous at best (he was an honored citizen, later a knight, both answering to others who wouldn't care (and didn't more then once) if they killed him along with everyone else. As a Knight of the Round, he only had one master to answer to, lessoning his chance of dying needlessly (then again...given his master...).
No where in my theory does it not give rise to the idea that the on-going geass orders (carving, for Suzaku to live, for the teacher to ignore irregularities with the boys, so on) are not active the moment Lelouch's geass re-activates.
I see no where in my theory that it is a 'stretch', it's a logical theory based on evidence to date, compiled, analyzed and presented.
(no subject)
I didn't say 'worn off', I said 'stopped', there's a difference in the wording and the actions after, my theory holds that it 're-starts'.
It'd be a stretch to assume so. If anything, Suzaku's will to live on might possibly be evidence that Lulu's geass is still affecting those that have experienced it. Otherwise, Suzaku might have gone back to his martyr-ish ways rather than taking an active role in changing the future.
Excepting the fact that a geass that goes against the very nature of someone is able to be fought against (see: Euphimia), this indicates that to live, is NOT against Suzaku's nature, whatever actions he displays consciously. Yes, consciously Suzaku displays actions that are self-sacrificial, but just as people's actions change as they grow (both physically and mentally), so do their sub-conscious actions, and as I'm not Suzaku's sub-conscious, I can't say for sure, but evidence leans to the idea that his sub-conscious actions lean towards living, saving himself, and secondary everyone else.
He killed his own father, to preserve himself (and by extension Japan), he sacrificed Lelouch in order to achive his own goals, putting himself in a better position to not only escape the stigma of his nationality, but his position which was perilous at best (he was an honored citizen, later a knight, both answering to others who wouldn't care (and didn't more then once) if they killed him along with everyone else. As a Knight of the Round, he only had one master to answer to, lessoning his chance of dying needlessly (then again...given his master...).
No where in my theory does it not give rise to the idea that the on-going geass orders (carving, for Suzaku to live, for the teacher to ignore irregularities with the boys, so on) are not active the moment Lelouch's geass re-activates.
I see no where in my theory that it is a 'stretch', it's a logical theory based on evidence to date, compiled, analyzed and presented.