Lol, that comes back to the assumption: try to push logic inside a show that is not based on logic is a match lost before it starts. =P
Reasoning on Geass is interesting, but also now, the most important twist in the story are mere consequence of fatality... so..
It's rather silly when they try to come up with "justifications" when all it really is is character favoritism.
That's it. One should be able to distinguish between "I like/hate him!" and "he's wrong/right!", or, if he's not, he should avoid discussing matters from a faux-analytical perspective.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
ninetydegrees![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Reasoning on Geass is interesting, but also now, the most important twist in the story are mere consequence of fatality... so..
It's rather silly when they try to come up with "justifications" when all it really is is character favoritism.
That's it. One should be able to distinguish between "I like/hate him!" and "he's wrong/right!", or, if he's not, he should avoid discussing matters from a faux-analytical perspective.