2006-11-30 23:07
loqi.livejournal.com in
code_geass
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Hello all! This is my first post to this community, even though I've been lurking for several weeks.
Unfortunately, I bear no gifts. Instead I have a transcription of what I thought is interesting in ep.7 on Suzaku's textbook.
The dots represent missing text and brackets represent my own words.
"... of Henry IX, son of the great [Elizabeth I?]... flourished as never before.
While other European countries stagnated assailed by waves of people's revolutions and parliamentarization, England held fast to absolute monarchy, and saw continued development through the reigns of King Henry X and Edward VI thanks to the wealth produced by the New World."
This tells us that Britannia came from an England that never gave way to constitutional monarchy. From the sounds of it in ep.3 and here, Queen Elizabeth I did marry and had a son named Henry IX, who doesn't actually exist in our world. So there would've been no Act of Union between Scotland and England and the English Civil War would not have happened. The kings after him are pretty powerful rulers too and that could be why the American revolution didn't happen or was won by the British.
Sorry for the extreme nerdiness there, but I've always liked British royal family history, even fictional ones. ^^;; I hope it's not too spam-ish.
By the way am I the only one who is grateful that they have someone who knows English to write these things?
Unfortunately, I bear no gifts. Instead I have a transcription of what I thought is interesting in ep.7 on Suzaku's textbook.
The dots represent missing text and brackets represent my own words.
"... of Henry IX, son of the great [Elizabeth I?]... flourished as never before.
While other European countries stagnated assailed by waves of people's revolutions and parliamentarization, England held fast to absolute monarchy, and saw continued development through the reigns of King Henry X and Edward VI thanks to the wealth produced by the New World."
This tells us that Britannia came from an England that never gave way to constitutional monarchy. From the sounds of it in ep.3 and here, Queen Elizabeth I did marry and had a son named Henry IX, who doesn't actually exist in our world. So there would've been no Act of Union between Scotland and England and the English Civil War would not have happened. The kings after him are pretty powerful rulers too and that could be why the American revolution didn't happen or was won by the British.
Sorry for the extreme nerdiness there, but I've always liked British royal family history, even fictional ones. ^^;; I hope it's not too spam-ish.
By the way am I the only one who is grateful that they have someone who knows English to write these things?
◾ Tags:
(no subject)
(no subject)
Seconded! (Amused, at the very least.)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Do I get points for thinking about doing it?That is some pretty awesome info. ^_^
By the way am I the only one who is grateful that they have someone who knows English to write these things?
I am too. I thought "WOAH! It's actually in English!" after I read what I could during the five seconds it was on the screen. :3
(no subject)
Prince Harry's real name is Henry, he always hated it so everyone calls him Harry, therefore if something happens to William, he will take over and Edward, Charles' brother would be second in line to the throne.
So what is written is very possible if the world did go into chaos.
(no subject)
So what is written is very possible if the world did go into chaos.
It's possible. I was hesitating about the Elizabeth I vs II (Shinsen translates it II, gg had I) but from what my very rusty Japanese can hear, there was no number. And since it was talking about New World and everything, I assumed it was Elizabeth I.
(no subject)
I've always thought that was how Britain split itself from the EEU. It's also interesting, though, that Schneizel and Clovis are Germanic names (Clovis's Frank), Euphemia and Cornelia are Latin/Greek and while I can't vouch for Nanaly, Lelouch and Marianne are so French. So instead of being completely Britannia in origins, did the Emperor marry nobles/princesses from the EEU countries to preserve the balance of power?
I have this image of Lelouch telling everyone he's French on his mother's side and Millay dressing him up as a French maid, Haruhi-Mikuru style(no subject)
Yes! Totally confirmed. XD
As for the language thing, it always amuses me when the underlings say "Yes, your Highness!" or "Yes, my lord!". It's like the little phrases of Japanese you read in fanfics.
You're right about the name thing. The half-brothers and sisters seem to be separated by their names' nationality (Schneizel is probably Clovis's brother, I mean, for a long time I thought Schneizel from the opening IS Clovis). Though I wonder if there are still nobles/princesses from the EEU (or is it EU?) countries that are still in power. Is it much like modern Europe or is it a step further and every single country is governed by domacracy? Are they even separate countries anymore?
If Ureshi-Shinsen's subbing is correct in that Marianne's maiden name is Ashford (gg's sub doesn't agree), then wouldn't Millay be French too? Student Council Maid Cafe!
(no subject)
I know. XD And it's a little confusing what language they're using in there. XD
I'm not sure...we have no idea how the democratic revolutions went in the EEU/EU. Perhaps, say, like France...they say Marianne's family wasn't nobility at first. Perhaps they overthrew the royal system but created a new class of burgoisie? Half-noble, half-merchant-ish, but powerful nonetheless? I'd say most EU could be a somewhat like how it is today, though. It's too diversified to ever come together like the United States, but every/most country are democratic monarchies? Like England/Sweden/et cetera today?
(no subject)
Posted by:(no subject)
Posted by:(no subject)
Posted by:(no subject)
Posted by:(no subject)
Posted by:(no subject)
Posted by:(no subject)
Posted by:(no subject)
Posted by:(no subject)
Posted by:(no subject)
Posted by:(no subject)
Posted by:(no subject)
Posted by:(no subject)
Posted by:(no subject)
Posted by:(no subject)
Posted by:(no subject)
Posted by:(no subject)
Posted by:(no subject)
Posted by:(no subject)
Posted by:(no subject)
Posted by:(no subject)
Posted by:(no subject)
Posted by:(no subject)
Posted by:(no subject)
Posted by:(no subject)
Posted by:(no subject)
Posted by:(no subject)
Posted by:(no subject)
Posted by:(no subject)
Posted by:(no subject)
Posted by:(no subject)
Posted by:(no subject)
Posted by:(no subject)
Posted by:(no subject)
Posted by:(no subject)
Posted by:(no subject)
And there I was wondering how the FUCK did the US turn into a monarchy... now it makes sense....
(No Oliver Cromwell then? XD)
(no subject)
Fortunately, or is it unfortunately? XD I can totally see him being rebellious though... or maybe he left for America like he intended to.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
I assumed it was a future world too until ep. 3 came along and read Henry IX in the sub, which got me kind of suspicious. But this passage definitely explains things.
I like how it is AU too. ^_^
(no subject)
(no subject)
Yay for cookies! *munches*
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
*Has even done a little research on Lancelot after the second episode*And indeed! I'm grateful for them to have someone who knows English these as well.
(no subject)
just curious, loqi, what country are you from? me = american so
im very grateful too ^_^
(no subject)
(no subject)
and holy crayola crayons! nice tsubasa icon!!!
(no subject)
Posted by:(no subject)
Posted by:(no subject)
Posted by:(no subject)
(no subject)
But as I said in my newer post, my theory is shaken by the mention of an Elizabeth III. We don't know which Elizabeth it was who was mentioned in ep. 3 as the mother of Henry IX.
(no subject)
Posted by: (Anonymous) - Date/Time: 2007-02-12 11:48 (UTC)